Skip to main content

Featured

Challenges And Debates Sociotechnical Systems

The study of sociotechnical systems and value judgments in technology is not without challenges and debates: Conflicting Values: Societies often have conflicting values, and technology development can raise questions about whose values should prevail. Balancing these values in a fair and equitable manner can be challenging. Cultural Relativism: The acknowledgment of cultural values raises questions about cultural relativism and the imposition of one culture's values on another. Striking a balance between respecting cultural diversity and upholding universal ethical principles can be complex. Technological Determinism: The influence of value judgments sometimes conflicts with the deterministic view of technology. Sociotechnical systems emphasize the human and social agency in shaping technology, challenging deterministic perspectives. Unintended Consequences: While value judgments guide technology development, they can also lead to unintended consequences. The choices made w...

Hair drug-testing guidelines sent to White House


Hair drug-testing guidelines sent to White House


WASHINGTON — A revamp of a controversial proposed rule setting requirements for the usage of hair to check truckers for tablets has been obtained by using the White House Office of Management and Budget for evaluate.

The rewrite become acquired Friday, consistent with OMB. Its Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), that is engaging in the evaluation, has as much as 90 days to evaluate the pointers being proposed by way of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. @ Read More healthynessdiet

An OIRA evaluation “facilitates to sell good enough interagency evaluate of draft proposed and final regulatory moves, in order that such actions are coordinated with other groups to keep away from inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative policies,” in step with OIRA.

Robin Hutcheson, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration leader, told attendees on the Truckload Carriers Association annual meeting remaining month to look for the proposed recommendations this summer season.

HHS’ proposed hair-test pointers, which if accredited (following a public remark period) could be used as the premise for a proposed rule through FMCSA, are the second one go-round at the inspiration.

The company’s first proposal, issued past due within the Trump administration, was panned — but for different motives — by way of huge trucking businesses in addition to proprietor-operators and labor.

Companies already screening drivers the use of hair and that need uniformity and a level playing field complained that the initial notion changed into no longer strict sufficient as it nevertheless allowed for different testing alternatives.

Major truckload carriers J.B. Hunt [NASDAQ: JBHT] and Schneider National [NYSE: SNDR] would like in order to rely entirely on hair checking out rather than being required to additionally test urine or saliva.

In feedback filed on the first HHS proposal, they warned that requiring a 2nd opportunity specimen test to affirm a test if a motive force exams superb the use of hair, as proposed inside the preliminary recommendations, could make the roads less secure because studies have proven that the “drug detection window” on hair is longer.

Small-business truckers and exertions unions opposing HHS’ first notion stated there are nevertheless privateness, value and other worries that outweigh introducing hair into federal place of job drug-testing necessities.

In addition, “just due to the fact a small percent of trucking organizations prefer to display screen their drivers using hair testing does not suggest the manner must be mandated for the complete enterprise,” wrote Todd Spencer, president and CEO of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, in 2020.

“Companies that should hotel to intense measures to catch up on excessive turnover prices may also locate hair checking out appropriate; however, that doesn't imply their methods, which aren't standardized, should be mandated.”

While HHS does no longer keep in mind the proposed suggestions to be an “economically big” rule — that means one in all likelihood to have an annual impact on the financial system of $100 million or more or could in any other case adversely affect the financial system — the company nevertheless considers it “good sized” in that it must be reviewed via OIRA and/or is a priority for the agency. @ Read More greenitc1403

Popular Posts